- Parent of ETM partner school student
Economically disadvantaged schools in New York City, already struggling with accessing core programs, experience more barriers to offering a comprehensive music program.
of schools in low-income areas of NYC reported decreased arts funding in the past year1
Schools in low-income areas of NYC are twice as likely as schools in high-income areas to have zero classrooms dedicated to music education7
Teacher turnover rates
1 These findings are based on calculations from the 2016-17 Arts in Schools Report (https://centerforartsed.org/sites/default/files/2016-17_annual_arts_in_schools_report_final.pdf) and district income data compiled in this report by the Center for New York City Affairs: (https://static1.squarespace.com/static/53ee4f0be4b015b9c3690d84/t 5b3a61c8758d46599ed10013/1530552778646/Paradox+of+Choice.pdf)
of families say it would be difficult for them to pay for private music lessons without a school music program
ETM partners with schools to provide music programs that make a difference. Our programming uses evidence-informed strategies that address the difficulties of implementing and sustaining a comprehensive school music program.
ETM’s programming is designed to combat teacher turnover and keep great music teachers in schools. We provide teachers with access to resources, mentoring, and professional networks that reduce professional isolation and help build support for music programming within the school culture.
Findings from the field of educational research suggest that teacher retention is driven by:
2 Bell-Robertson, C. G. (2015). Beyond Mentoring: A Review of Literature Detailing the Need for Additional and Alternative Forms of Support for Novice Music Teachers. Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, 33(2), 41-48.
3 Ingersoll, R., & Smith, T.M. (2004). Do Teacher Induction and Mentoring Matter? NAASP Bulletin,
88 (638), 28-40; Loeb, S., Darling-Hammond, L., & Luczak, J. (2005). How Teaching Conditions
Predict Teacher Turnover in California Schools’s. Peabody Journal of Education, 80(3), 44-70.
4 Benson, M. A. (2008). Effective Mentoring for New Music Teachers: An Analysis of the Mentoring Programs for New Music Teachers as Described in the Literature. Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, 26(2), 42-49.
5 Boyd, D., Grossman, P., Ing, M., Lankford, H., Loeb, S., & Wyckoff, J. (2011). The Influence of
School Administrators on Teacher Retention Decisions. American Educational Research Journal,
48(2), 303-333; Ingersoll, R., & Smith, T.M. (2004). Do Teacher Induction and Mentoring Matter?
NAASP Bulletin, 88 (638), 28-40; Ladd, H., (2011). Teachers’ Perceptions of Their Working
Conditions: How Predictive of Planned and Actual Teacher Movement? 33(2), 235.261.
of music teachers agree that because of their affiliation with ETM they have become part of a community of music teachers
of music teachers agree that benchmarks provided by ETM are helpful for creating a curriculum
say their mentor is there when needed and timely in their responses
of surveyed partner school principals agree that concerts and musical performances are an important part of their school’s culture
- Principal at ETM partner school